The Collaborative Forum

Vince’s post begs the question: “So…if one were to redesign the MMHD to fulfill the potential for both improving care quality (through access to an appropriate “Medical Home”) while simultaneously reducing healthcare costs, where might we start?”

Vince points us in the right direction in his post, calling our attention to the work of Randall Brown in his report of another CMS demonstration, the Care Coordination Demonstration. Brown points out two key observations:

1. Care Coordination, to save money, must start with the “right” population target; and,

2. Care Coordination interventions can only save money if they don’t COST more than about $120 per participant per month (the amount likely to be saved from a well-designed intervention).

In other words, the solution to the dilemma has two aspects: 1. FOCUS and 2. EXECUTION. Read the rest of this entry →

by Vince Kuraitis, Principal, Better Health Technologies

“Between a rock and a hard place.” Meaning:  In difficulty, faced with a choice between two unsatisfactory options. The Phrase Finder

Before it has even started, the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration (MMHD) is in BIG trouble.

Congress passed legislation authorizing the MMHD in 2006. It is scheduled to begin in January 2010. The MMHD is Medicare’s major test of the Patient Centered Medical Home model being promoted by primary care physicians.

Between the time the MMHD was authorized and now, we’ve learned a lot about what works and what doesn’t work in Medicare care coordination programs. The MMHD is between a rock and a hard place — conflicted by two “must achieve” objectives that are diametrically opposed:

• As a political matter, the MMHD must save money
• As currently structured, the MMHD cannot save money

Let’s look at each half of the dilemma separately.

As A Political Matter, the MMHD Must Save Money

The “Thought Leader’s Corner” in the May 2009 issue of Medical Home News poses a provocative question:

Q: How important will it be for future Medical Home development to be able to show that the Medical Home model generates real, well documented cost savings?

Here are excerpts of how a spectrum of political and health system leaders answered the question: Read the rest of this entry →

In a recent post (July 24, 2009), I introduced the topic of medication adherence and decribed three pillars of system reform that would seek to address the nearly $300 Billion in annual costs related to patients not taking their medications.  Recall, these pillars were: improved drug regimens, reduced cost barriers, and patient behavior.  In today’s post, let’s describe 5 of the 10 levers as put forth by the New England Healthcare Institute (NEHI) that represent high value opportunities to improve medication adherence. Read the rest of this entry →