The Collaborative Forum

by Vince Kuraitis, Principal, Better Health Technologies

“Between a rock and a hard place.” Meaning:  In difficulty, faced with a choice between two unsatisfactory options. The Phrase Finder

Before it has even started, the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration (MMHD) is in BIG trouble.

Congress passed legislation authorizing the MMHD in 2006. It is scheduled to begin in January 2010. The MMHD is Medicare’s major test of the Patient Centered Medical Home model being promoted by primary care physicians.

Between the time the MMHD was authorized and now, we’ve learned a lot about what works and what doesn’t work in Medicare care coordination programs. The MMHD is between a rock and a hard place — conflicted by two “must achieve” objectives that are diametrically opposed:

• As a political matter, the MMHD must save money
• As currently structured, the MMHD cannot save money

Let’s look at each half of the dilemma separately.

As A Political Matter, the MMHD Must Save Money

The “Thought Leader’s Corner” in the May 2009 issue of Medical Home News poses a provocative question:

Q: How important will it be for future Medical Home development to be able to show that the Medical Home model generates real, well documented cost savings?

Here are excerpts of how a spectrum of political and health system leaders answered the question: Read the rest of this entry →

In a recent post (July 24, 2009), I introduced the topic of medication adherence and decribed three pillars of system reform that would seek to address the nearly $300 Billion in annual costs related to patients not taking their medications.  Recall, these pillars were: improved drug regimens, reduced cost barriers, and patient behavior.  In today’s post, let’s describe 5 of the 10 levers as put forth by the New England Healthcare Institute (NEHI) that represent high value opportunities to improve medication adherence. Read the rest of this entry →

President Obama has made healthcare – and rising healthcare costs – a national priority, and it’s easy to see why.  As a country, we spend 2 Trillion dollars a year on healthcare, yet one in two Americans, or close to 200 Million of us, suffer from chronic diseases that decrease quality of life and increase healthcare costs. 

Click on The Value Quadrant To Enlarge

Chronic disease is a problem that many physicians see daily in their clinical practices…I sure did.  It is one that causes countless unnecessary and avoidable hospitalizations.  This problem largely reflects a lack of simple coordination of information and care processes, as well as a lack of programs and approaches for patients with chronic disease to become more involved in their daily self-care.

Unfortunately, the burden of chronic disease falls largely to the elderly and vulnerable, in other words, Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries.  As an example, if you are a Medicare beneficiary with congestive heart failure, you and your peers consume 40% of the Medicare annual budget.  A short list of chronic conditions account for 95% of Medicare expenditures, and over 80% of Medicaid costs.  It is a small wonder that the Medicare Trust Fund is predicted to be insolvent by 2018!

So…how can healthcare reform properly focus on achieving the biggest bang for the buck?  (In other words, move to the Value Quadrant). Read the rest of this entry →